As I said in this blog, if you blow your nose in public, this does not shock the Japanese, unless you make a really nasty noise. Indeed, the Japanese politeness is something mythical. I once read on the internet that it's not polite not to make noise when eating noodles in Japan. It's really ridiculous. If it makes noise when eating noodles, it does not bother anyone in Japan. And that's all. I wonder where we could draw This bizarre idea. It is possible that Edokko ( Tokyoite ) makes his compatriot who does not sound a remark like, "Hey, are you a stranger ( gaïzin [gaijin] ) or not? When you eat the noodles, you make noise! Like this! " (And it makes noise exaggeration.) But this has nothing to do with politeness, but rather the Beaufre. Perhaps the truth is it that one or more Japanese have responded to the question "Why do you noise when you eat noodles?" by the response "That's being polite." But this automation that answers all questions by the myth of Japanese politeness is just pathetic cretins. And you do not offend either the Japanese when you ask them "Mireille Mathieu is well known in Japan, right?" They do not know, that's all. We can be shocked by what we do not know. I think it was a joke about hair Japanese girls ( okappa ) originally. French tourists at the time were probably said "But they are all fans of Johnny Mathis or what!"
So what can shock the Japanese? For example, if you talk to a Japanese emperor, it can be shocking. But no, I do not speak at all taboo. However, I say that is the word "emperor" is shocking. For the Japanese, Tenno is nothing that Tenno, and that word is untranslatable. It is the source of all that is "It's Japanese, it's unexplainable." They do not prepare any answer to the question "If this is not an emperor, what is it?" The Tenno Tenno is 's all.
Then the question "Who is the head of state to Japan?" embarrassed the Japanese. What is the official answer to this question? Surprise! It does not. Embarrassed by the perpetual question, the Department Foreign Affairs said the head of state was the Tenno , but it was a "false start". In reality, there is no law that says the head of state of Japan is the Emperor (Tenno ). There are people who support right-wing "The Prime Minister can not be head of state, because its weight is very light." But the lack of majesty of the Prime Minister is not proof that the Tenno is the head of state. If you see the picture of the imperial couple in a Japanese embassy, this does not mean that the emperor is the head of state, but the ambasssade is the responsibility of the Ministry Foreign Affairs.
And then call the Emperor by his childhood name (Hirohito, Akihito) can shock the Japanese, unless they are communists or sympathizers. The French newspaper Naruhito talks about when it comes to the current prince, but I doubt that most Japanese have never heard the name. Communists prefer to call them by their childhood name, because it is not their taste not call them by their title as almost all Japanese do.
Besides the Emperor, if you mean the Japanese army, you're shocked necessarily Japanese. The defense budget of Japan is still in the top 10 worldwide, but Japanese do not believe that the state has an army of Japan. Because the Constitution says that the army does not exist in Japan! For me (who am however a very good Japanese), this is just absurd, but strangely it seems to me that all Japanese believe. Like Tenno which is nothing but Tenno, the Jieitai (Self-Defense Forces, official translation and unfortunate) is Jieitai , but this is not an army. Leftists cretinization do not want to change one line of the 1946 Constitution because of Article 9, which renounces war. But why "constitutional change" should it mean for them the deletion of Article 9? In Japan, people who are for the amendment of the Constitution are classified as right. So I want to delete the first chapter of consitutes "The Emperor (Tenno )" I'm right a priori. lol Do not touch the 1946 Constitution, which should be something sacred. (Apparently, the Japanese has left the meaning of the sacred.) And all that matters to these people so-called left is only to protect Article 9, and they never talk about the dissolution of the SDF that this carries a sense artilcle! A meaning that is worthy of what he said!
I think I wrote this article to say "Go to shock the Japanese!" :-P
So what can shock the Japanese? For example, if you talk to a Japanese emperor, it can be shocking. But no, I do not speak at all taboo. However, I say that is the word "emperor" is shocking. For the Japanese, Tenno is nothing that Tenno, and that word is untranslatable. It is the source of all that is "It's Japanese, it's unexplainable." They do not prepare any answer to the question "If this is not an emperor, what is it?" The Tenno Tenno is 's all.
Then the question "Who is the head of state to Japan?" embarrassed the Japanese. What is the official answer to this question? Surprise! It does not. Embarrassed by the perpetual question, the Department Foreign Affairs said the head of state was the Tenno , but it was a "false start". In reality, there is no law that says the head of state of Japan is the Emperor (Tenno ). There are people who support right-wing "The Prime Minister can not be head of state, because its weight is very light." But the lack of majesty of the Prime Minister is not proof that the Tenno is the head of state. If you see the picture of the imperial couple in a Japanese embassy, this does not mean that the emperor is the head of state, but the ambasssade is the responsibility of the Ministry Foreign Affairs.
And then call the Emperor by his childhood name (Hirohito, Akihito) can shock the Japanese, unless they are communists or sympathizers. The French newspaper Naruhito talks about when it comes to the current prince, but I doubt that most Japanese have never heard the name. Communists prefer to call them by their childhood name, because it is not their taste not call them by their title as almost all Japanese do.
Besides the Emperor, if you mean the Japanese army, you're shocked necessarily Japanese. The defense budget of Japan is still in the top 10 worldwide, but Japanese do not believe that the state has an army of Japan. Because the Constitution says that the army does not exist in Japan! For me (who am however a very good Japanese), this is just absurd, but strangely it seems to me that all Japanese believe. Like Tenno which is nothing but Tenno, the Jieitai (Self-Defense Forces, official translation and unfortunate) is Jieitai , but this is not an army. Leftists cretinization do not want to change one line of the 1946 Constitution because of Article 9, which renounces war. But why "constitutional change" should it mean for them the deletion of Article 9? In Japan, people who are for the amendment of the Constitution are classified as right. So I want to delete the first chapter of consitutes "The Emperor (Tenno )" I'm right a priori. lol Do not touch the 1946 Constitution, which should be something sacred. (Apparently, the Japanese has left the meaning of the sacred.) And all that matters to these people so-called left is only to protect Article 9, and they never talk about the dissolution of the SDF that this carries a sense artilcle! A meaning that is worthy of what he said!
I think I wrote this article to say "Go to shock the Japanese!" :-P
0 comments:
Post a Comment